Searcy Bypass Tax Passes

The sales tax proposal to fund the $3 million match for the Searcy Bypass and other road improvements passed 1,531 to 646. The election victory is a win in Mayor David Morris' efforts to restore the voters trust in our city government following the poorly designed tax proposals the city and county have put forward since the city's fire station tax.

City 1 Percent Sales Tax Proposal

On December 13 from 7:30 A.M. to 7:30 P.M., voters in Ward 2 will have the opportunity to vote on the Searcy 1 percent sales tax increase at the West Race Baptist Church. If passed, the tax will be collected in Searcy from April 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. This tax is anticipated to raise about $7.5 million.

This tax differs from the White County sales tax increase voted down in September in many respects including:

• This tax will only be collected in Searcy instead of county-wide
• This tax is for 15 months
• This tax is specifically allocated in Ordinance 2011-29 to be for road improvements in Searcy including the $3 million match for the northern portion of the Searcy bypass

 If you have not had the opportunity to early vote, take some time today to vote on this tax proposal.

2011 Uncontested School Board Election Races

Most of the school board races in White County are uncontested this year, and it is the Position 5 race in Bald Knob between Phillip Helms and Novy Newkirk. The election will be September 20. Early voting started September 13 at the White County Clerk's office, and it ends September 19. The Clerk's office is open 8 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. Monday through Friday.

For those of you interested in who is running for each of the school board positions, you may download a copy here.

White County 1 Percent Sales Tax Increase Defeated

Reliable reports are circulating that voters rejected the White County 1 percent sales tax increase proposal at the polls today. The election results we've seen indicate 5725 voters cast ballots, and 56.7 percent of those votes were against the tax increase proposal.

With 3248 voting against the tax and 2477 voting for it, the Moving White County Forward Committee spent at least $10 per vote cast for the tax to help pass the measure (assuming they paid for the radio commercials they ran on Crain Media stations claiming they were paid for by the committee).

As a follow up to our previous post on the Arkansas Ethics Commission filings for the Moving White County Forward Committee, they did eventually file a financial report for July as required by Arkansas state law. According to the Ethics Commission Web site, it was filed September 8 (it was due August 15), which still makes them eligible for a hefty fine for not following the law. Further, they amended their pre-election report on September 8 correcting several discrepancies with their previous filing. Neither report lists paying for any radio ads on Crain Media stations, and the amended pre-election report still shows that Crain Media contributed $2,000 to the organization, a contribution which Crain Media reportedly denied making on the air around 8 A.M. the morning of September 12.

Both Moving White County Forward Committee and the Citizens for Responsible Taxation (and anyone else required to file papers with the Ethics Commission on their efforts to promote or campaign against the tax) will also be required to file post-election financial reports.

Vote on the White County Sales Tax Increase

Registered voters in White County have an opportunity to vote September 13 on the proposed 1 percent, county-wide sales tax increase. To cast your vote, go to your normal voting precinct location tomorrow between 7:30 A.M. and 7:30 P.M. If you aren't sure where to go to vote, visit the Arkansas Secretary of State's Voter View Web Site and enter your information. Or, you may contact the White Co. Clerk's office at 501-279-6204.

If you still need more information on what this tax increase will support, do some online research. A good place to start is to compare the two major opposing Web sites. The Moving White County Forward Committee's commercials on the radio send listeners to WCRoads on Facebook for information in favor of the 1 percent tax increase. The Citizens for Responsible Taxation, who oppose the tax, also have a Web site with information against the sales tax proposal. You can read the ordinance the Quorum Court passed in June to set the election HERE.

Don't let this opportunity to exercise your right to vote pass you by. Inform yourself on the issue, and vote for or against the bypass tax on September 13.

Moving White County Forward Bypassed State Ethics Laws

White County votes on a 1 percent sales tax increase September 13. You may be aware that our Alderman Steve Sterling accused some of the people opposing that tax of lying. What will he have to say about Buck Layne, Reynie Rutledge, and the rest of Moving White County Forward when he learns they have violated state ethics laws?

Moving White County Forward filed their organization papers and pre-election report with the Arkansas Ethics Commission on September 6, the day early voting started on White County's tax increase proposal. In their statement of organization, they list Buck Layne, President of the Searcy Chamber of Commerce, and Reynie Rutledge, President and CEO of First Security Bancorp, as officers. Unfortunately, according to Moving White County Forward's pre-election report, the organization received its first contribution July 13 ($10,000 from the Searcy Regional Economic Development Corp., i.e. the Searcy Chamber of Commerce). Arkansas Code Annotated (ACA) § 606 (a)(1)(A) requires that "a legislative question committee shall file a statement of organization with the Arkansas Ethics Commission within five (5) days of receiving contributions or making expenditures in excess of five hundred dollars ($500)." Moving White County Forward should have filed its statement of organization no later than July 18. Since they did not file until about seven weeks after that, the organization and its officers violated state law, and the law specifies that a "legislative question committee failing to file a statement of organization required by this section shall be subject to a late filing fee not exceeding fifty dollars ($50.00) for each day the statement remains not filed." Apparently, Buck Layne and Reynie Rutledge owe a hefty fee to the Arkansas Ethics Commission. 

Furthermore, the "Citizens for the Hwy 13 Project - Moving White County Forward Committee" should have filed a financial report for July as specified in ACA §610 (a)(1) "The first financial reports shall be filed no later than fifteen (15) days following the month in which the five hundred dollar ($500) threshold of § 607 is met." With the August 15 deadline for that report long-since passed without it being filed, state law requires this "late financial report shall be subject to a late filing fee not exceeding fifty dollars ($50.00) for each day the report remains unfiled."

Finally, in addition to the other problems with Moving White County Forward's filings listed elsewhere, the pre-election report they filed should cover the time period from August 1 to September 3 per ACA § 610 (a)(2) "a preelection financial report shall be filed no fewer than seven (7) days prior to any election on the ballot question or legislative question, such statement to have a closing date of ten (10) days prior to the election." However, the report does not provide information on September 1st through 3rd.

Since the Searcy Chamber of Commerce is Moving White County Forward's biggest supporter, the Chamber board of directors, including our Alderman Jim Dixon (a Senior Vice President at Liberty Bank, which gave Moving White County Forward $2,000) and White County Judge Michael Lincoln, ought to be ensuring that Chamber President Buck Layne, Reynie Rutledge, and Moving White County Forward obey Arkansas Ethics laws. White County voters should carefully consider the lengths Moving White County Forward has gone to promote the White County sales tax increase when they vote on it September 13.

White County Sales Tax Increase Special Election

Sneaking up on residents of Searcy Ward 2 (and all of White County) is the special election on September 13, 2011, for the sales tax increase to help fund the Searcy bypass. In fact, early voting began today at the White County Clerk's office in Searcy, AR. The White County Clerk's office hours are 8 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. Monday through Friday.

The exact times for early voting are not available on the White County Clerk's Web site, so you may want to call ahead (501-279-6204). Not only is there no information about early voting on the tax available on the White County Web site, the election isn't mentioned there at all.

Supporters of the tax have an online presence, but they have not chosen to share information about the times for voting or the details of the tax proposal. The only copy of the tax ordinace we could find was on BypasstheBypassTax.com, a Web site sponsored by Citizens for Responsible Taxation who oppose the tax. The sales tax increase would be 1 percent on any sales tax eligible purchases in White County for 21 months. If it passes, the money we pay would be distributed to the cities and the county based on population with 87.5 percent of the funds to be spent on road, bridge, and drainage repairs and 12.5 percent to be spent on "economic development," which includes many things and is intended to "stimulate the local economy." You can read the proposal yourself HERE.

Whether you are for or against the Searcy bypass or our White County government increasing our taxes for 21 months, make sure you early vote starting September 6 or vote on election day September 13.

Time Running Out for A&P Tax Refunds

The deadline of January 18, 2011 to submit refunds for A&P taxes paid in Searcy, AR, from July to December 2009 will soon be here. Make sure to visit the City Clerk's A&P tax refund page for details on how to submit and collect your tax refund.

The Searcy Ward 2 Election Results

For election for Ward 2 Position 1, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reports the following 2010 election results:

• Alderman Jim Dixon - 1063 votes (52.65%)
• Dan Hodges - 956 votes (47.35%)

For the Ward 2 Position 2 race, the Democrat-Gazette reports the following results:

• Alderman Steve Sterling - 997 votes (50.1%)
• Robert Allen - 661 votes (33.22%)
• David Philpott - 332 votes (16.68%)

Had Alderman Sterling not received more than 50 percent of the vote, he would have faced a runoff with Robert Allen.

We hope that over the next two years Aldermen Jim Dixon and Steve Sterling will listen to the voters in Ward 2 and represent us rather than a mayor's agenda or special interest groups.

What Have the Ward 2 Position 1 Candidates Said and Done?

On election day (November 2, 2010), the polls are open statewide from 7:30 A.M. to 7:30 P.M. Visit the Arkansas Secretary of State Web site for sample ballots and other voter information. Also, the White County Clerk has information on polling locations in White County available online.

Who represents the PEOPLE of Searcy? Here are the FACTS.

Dan Hodges

• SERVED THE PEOPLE of Searcy as Alderman for twelve years.
• While serving as alderman, consistently voted to ALLOW THE PEOPLE TO VOTE ON THEIR TAXES.
• Voted to EXPAND AND IMPROVE POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT FACILITIES.
• Served on the Budget Committee as well as the Parks and Rec committee for the city of Searcy.
• Supported the efforts of OVER A THOUSAND OF YOUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS who stood up to demand their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO VOTE be preserved through the referendum process.
• Spoke with THE PEOPLE OF SEARCY on a regular basis to gain an understanding of their opinions and tried to share those opinions with the elected officials of Searcy.
• Went door to door to let THE PEOPLE know about the special election regarding the A&P tax and to PROVIDE THE PEOPLE WITH THE FACTS.
• Volunteered with various civic organizations to help MAKE SEARCY A BETTER PLACE.

Jim Dixon

• Voted AGAINST a motion to let THE PEOPLE vote on the A&P tax on March 10, 2009 and again on July 14, 2009.
• Voted for an ordinance creating the A&P tax WITHOUT LETTING THE PEOPLE VOTE on 3 occasions: March 10, 2009, April 14, 2009, & May 12, 2009.
• Voted on October 13, 2009 to “postpone indefinitely” a motion to let THE PEOPLE vote on the A&P tax after a judge had already ruled the city COULD NOT LEGALLY ignore the referendum petitions which the city clerk had certified.
• Voted on June 9, 2009 to take actions after being provided an attorney general opinion which said THESE ACTIONS WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
• Voted on January 12, 2010, February 16, 2010, and February 23, 2010 to make it HARDER FOR THE PEOPLE TO HOLD THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE by limiting the filing of referendum petitions to 30 days (it had previously been 90 days).
• Voted on December 8, 2009 to hold a special election in April instead of waiting one month to hold the election in May.* Holding the election in April WASTED THOUSANDS OF TAX DOLLARS that would have been saved by voting in May.

Alderman Dixon’s voting record as cited above can be verified by reading the minutes from city council meetings on the city’s web site, Searcy.com and clicking on “City Departments” “Clerk/Treasurer” “Agendas/Minutes”.

*Although discussion of and initial voting on the ordinance occurred during the 12/8/2009 City Council meeting, the City did not deem the voting "official" until the 12/21/2009 meeting.

The Facts About the Ward 2 Position 2 Candidates

Who represents the PEOPLE of Searcy? Here are the FACTS.

Robert Allen

• Proudly SERVED OUR COUNTRY IN THE MILITARY during the Vietnam War.
• President Elect of Searcy Civitan International Club.
• HAS HELPED PROTECT CHILDREN as a member of CASA since 2007.
• Supported the efforts of OVER A THOUSAND OF YOUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS who stood up to demand their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO VOTE be preserved through the referendum process.
• Spoke with THE PEOPLE OF SEARCY on a regular basis to gain an understanding of their opinions and tried to share those opinions with the elected officials of Searcy.
• Went door to door to let THE PEOPLE know about the special election regarding the A&P tax and to PROVIDE THE PEOPLE WITH THE FACTS.

Steve Sterling

• Voted AGAINST a motion to let THE PEOPLE vote on the A&P tax on March 10, 2009 and again on July 14, 2009.
• Voted for an ordinance creating the A&P tax WITHOUT LETTING THE PEOPLE VOTE on 3 occasions: March 10, 2009, April 14, 2009, & May 12, 2009.
• Voted on October 13, 2009 to “postpone indefinitely” a motion to let THE PEOPLE vote on the A&P tax after a judge had already ruled the city COULD NOT LEGALLY ignore the referendum petitions which the city clerk had certified.
• Voted on June 9, 2009 to take actions after being provided an attorney general opinion which said THESE ACTIONS WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
• Voted on January 12, 2010, February 16, 2010, and February 23, 2010 to make it HARDER FOR THE PEOPLE TO HOLD THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE by limiting the filing of referendum petitions to 30 days (it had previously been 90 days).
• Voted on December 8, 2009 to hold a special election in April instead of waiting one month to hold the election in May.* Holding the election in April WASTED THOUSANDS OF TAX DOLLARS that would have been saved by voting in May.

Alderman Sterling’s voting record as cited above can be verified by reading the minutes from city council meetings on the city’s web site, Searcy.com and clicking on “City Departments” “Clerk/Treasurer” “Agendas/Minutes”.

*Although discussion of and initial voting on the ordinance occurred during the 12/8/2009 City Council meeting, the City did not deem the voting "official" until the 12/21/2009 meeting.

Our Aldermen Should Stand for What's Right

On October 14, a Federal judge ruled that a "lawsuit brought by 20 states challenging the health-care overhaul law" can move forward, and those states can "contest whether the law's 'individual mandate' requiring virtually all Americans to buy health insurance exceeds Congress's constitutional authority." As we read about the debate on the constitutionality of Federal health insurance legislation, Searcy voters may remember our own city government exceeding their constitutional authority in June 2009.

In the June 2009 Searcy City Council meeting, Alderman Steve Sterling, Alderman Jim Dixon, and three other City Council members (English, Chalenburg, and Arnett) voted to appoint the initial seven A&P Commission members recommended by Mayor Belinda LaForce. Some of those appointees were not qualified electors (they did not live in the city limits), which violated Ark. Const. art. 19, Sec. 3. In the meeting, the Council discussed Attorney General's opinion #2007-055. In this opinion, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel explained that the Arkansas Constitution requires Commission members to be qualified electors. In appointing the A&P Commission members, the Mayor and those five aldermen ignored the Arkansas Constitution (the other three voted against the appointments).

Despite City Attorney Buck Gibson's and Mayor Belinda LaForce's assertions that the appointments were not unconstitutional, Aldermen Mary Ann Arnett and Mike Chalenburg requested a legal opinion on the issue from the Lightle Law Firm, and they received the law firm's response June 15, 2009. The City Attorney and the Mayor were copied on the response and received the legal opinion. In the opinion attached to that email, the Lightle Firm advised the city to obey the Arkansas Constitution and Attorney General's opinion.

In his response to the Lightle Law Firm, Alderman Chalenburg said, "It may be a disappointment to some, but we do need to abide by the law. We simply believe that if there is a good chance that the appointment process of the A&P Commission is suspect it would be better to deal with it now and not later...I also agree we need to abide by the law." However, Mayor Belinda LaForce, City Attorney Buck Gibson, Alderman Mary Ann Arnett, and Alderman Mike Chalenburg did not take action to correct this violation of the state constitution.

In a March 4, 2010, article in the Daily Citizen, Warren Watkins reported that the City Attorney and the Mayor said the following:

• "Three commissioners may have to resign if the city council follows their attorney’s advice. At a joint meeting of the Searcy Advertising and Tourism Promotions (A&P) Commission and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board held Wednesday afternoon at city hall, Searcy City Attorney Buck Gibson advised those gathered that an amendment would need to be made to the council’s ordinance for the A&P tax and commission requiring A&P commissioners to be Searcy residents."
• "Mayor Belinda LaForce said she was concerned with the residency issue and noted it had surfaced some months ago and needed to be resolved. A&P commissioners Oliver Montano, Bob White and Amanda Foust do not live in the city, LaForce said."

The Arkansas Constitution and Attorney General's opinions on the qualifications for Commission members did not change from June 2009 to March 2010. What did change to make City Attorney Gibson and Mayor LaForce speak out against their own actions?

Alderman Sterling and Alderman Dixon chose to go along with Mayor LaForce. Our Searcy Aldermen should all have the courage to stand up to a Mayor that chooses to ignore the Arkansas Constitution.

Ward 2 Aldermen and Deficit Spending

During her two terms as Mayor, Belinda LaForce has relied on deficit spending to run Searcy's city government with the support of aldermen like Jim Dixon and Steve Sterling.

Deficit Spending: Jim Dixon vs Dan Hodges
Deficit budgets over the past five years have grown the city's spending as one year's deficit spending becomes the next year's "budgeted" spending.

In the December 2005 and January 2006 debate over the 2006 city budget, the City Council and Mayor LaForce disagreed over the 2006 budget because it proposed deficit spending. In a December 21, 2005, article in the Daily Citizen, Mariea Grayson reported that "LaForce's budget remains $268,482.08 in the red." The article quotes Mayor LaForce's view of the 2006 budget,

"'I want to appropriate money from the reserves to take care of the deficit.' LaForce told council members."

"'In the first of 2005, they appropriated $190,000 or more out of the reserves,' LaForce said, 'All I'm asking is they do the same thing in 2006.'"

"LaForce said there are only two options left to the city. 'We either pull it out of the reserves or raise revenues,' she said."

Mayor LaForce proposed this deficit budget December 13, December 20, January 10, and January 11 and insisted on using the reserves rather than cut spending. The budget passed January 11, 2006, with Mayor LaForce casting the tie-breaking vote. Mariea Grayson reported in a January 12, 2006, Daily Citizen article,

"Searcy will have to make up $268,482 with reserve funds or other unknown income."

"LaForce said she doesn't understand the problem the council is having appropriating money from unappropriated funds to cover the budget."

Mayor LaForce proposed deficit budgets for both 2005 and 2006 using reserve funds (the city's saved up, unallocated money from more "revenues" coming in than anticipated) to make up the difference.

The City Council shares the blame for this past deficit spending because they voted for it. Alderman Jim Dixon voted for both these budgets (December 14, 2004; January 11, 2006). Had he not voted for the 2006 deficit spending, Mayor LaForce would not have been able cast the tie-breaking vote for it. In contrast, Dan Hodges, who served Ward 2 as an alderman in 2005-2006, voted against Mayor LaForce's 2006 deficit spending.

More Deficit Spending: Dixon and Sterling
One alderman for Ward 2 has changed, but the deficit spending continues. From January 2009 to September 2010, the city's reserves have declined from $2.267 million to $1.201 million according to the city's financial statements. In fact, according to the September 2010 financial statement, the city has built up a deficit for this year of over $475,000. The city has only collected 64.9% of their projected revenue in nine months (75% of the year), and the Mayor and City Council have spent 68% of their budgeted revenue for the first three quarters of 2010.

In the past two years, Aldermen Jim Dixon and Steve Sterling have not only voted for all of the policy items Mayor LaForce placed on the City Council meeting agendas, they have also voted for over $1,000,000 of deficit spending despite our uncertain economic times.

Improving the Searcy Code of Ordinances

The Growing Regulatory Burden
Every year, individuals and businesses contend with a growing number of laws, regulations, and ordinances created at all levels of government. At the national level, organizations such as Freedom Works, The Heritage Foundation, and OverCriminalized.com seek to inform citizens about the growing restrictions to our freedom and to motivate them to take action in support of common sense, simplified Federal laws and regulations. The Arkansas chapter of Americans for Prosperity is working for similar goals with citizens at the state level.

At the Federal level, the growing costs of regulations and laws impacts all of us.

• According to an article on the Freedom Works Web site, "excessive regulation, such as excessive taxation of any business or industry, can weaken or even kill it"
• In the Freedom Works Issues section, they say, "Complying with the thousands of regulations federal bureaucrats are scheduled to approve this year could cost American individuals and businesses over $700 billion. This figure doesn't even take into account the indirect costs imposed by these regulations including loss of productivity and limits on innovation and growth."
• According to the Heritage Foundation, "the size and scope of the regulatory state grew significantly" during President George W. Bush's tenure, and it "is currently rising at more than twice" that rate under President Obama

New Searcy Ordinances
People are becoming more aware of the impact the growth of laws and regulations have on their lives. Even on the city level here in Searcy, the regulatory burden on individuals and businesses has increased over the past two years. Several ordinances were passed creating new regulations for us to follow. They include:

• Ordinance 2009-23 "to provide for the regulation of certain adult oriented businesses," which had previously been banned (passed July 14, 2009)
• Ordinance 2009-24 "establishing regulations concerning the conduct of yard sales, garage sales, and other similar activities" (passed July 14, 2009)
• Ordinance 2010-04  "setting a thirty-day period for filing referendum petitions" (passed February 23, 2010)
• Ordinance 2010-07 "to adopt procedural rules of governance for meetings of the Searcy City Council" (passed March 9, 2010)
• Ordinance 2010-15 "to prohibit the sale, use or possession, or offering for sale, certain synthetic cannabanoid substances known as 'K-2'" (passed June 8, 2010)
• Ordinance 2010-22 "to amend the Code of Ordinances to create a Searcy Tree Board" (passed August 10, 2010)

Overlapping Ordinances: An Example
While some of these ordinances were necessary, others may not have been. For example, Ordinance 2009-24 established the following new regulations for garage sales in the city limits:

• "Garage sale" defined as "the sale of any personal property, which is conducted on or about the premises of a private residence, by any resident or residents of a neighborhood, one of whom must be the occupant of the residence and which sale is open to the public"
• Maximum of 8 garage sales per person per year
• Maximum of 2 garage sales per person per quarter
• A garage sale may "not exceed a total of three (3) "total days in length which shall be held on any of five (5) days"
• Garage sale merchandise is "limited to used property and not property purchased for resale"
• Signs advertising for the garage sale "must be removed withing four (4) hours after the end of the Garage Sale"
• Use of a public address system is not allowed
• "Goods for sale and items used in conjunction with the Garage Sale must be removed within (24) twenty-four hours of the conclusion of the Garage Sale."
• The ordinance does "not apply to churches, schools or not-for-profit organizations"

However, in June 2009, Section 9 and Section 17 of the Searcy Code of Ordinances were sufficient to achieve compliance with city code in an incident in which Alderman Mary Ann Arnett asked Mayor Belinda LaForce to have garage sale items removed from a yard in River Oaks.

• Alderman Arnett requested help from Mayor LaForce regarding what Alderman Arnett called a "Hispanic Garage Sale"
• Mayor LaForce asked for intervention from Code Enforcement
• Code Enforcement reported on their successful enforcement actions
• Alderman Arnett thanked Mayor LaForce for her help

The new garage sale regulations were added to our Code of Ordinances, which already had Sections 9 and 17 restricting us from using our homes as retail outlets and displaying goods for sale in our yards for extended amounts of time. Furthermore, the existing code specifies penalties in Section 1 for any violations.

Outdated Ordinances
More troublesome are other sections of the Code of Ordinances that are no longer enforced or that may be unequally enforced throughout the city. Some examples include:

• Sec. 14 - Requires us to place our garbage in metal cans with handles no larger than 20 gallons no earlier than "6:00 p.m. on the day prior to scheduled collection" and, if not followed, specifies fines ranging from $15 to $100 that are simply added to your water bill
• Sec. 24-1 - Seems to be outlawing a significant portion of the vending that occurs at events like Get Down Downtown:

"It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to park or place any vehicle, trailer, conveyance or other object upon the streets, alleys and other public ways of the City within a radius of three (3) blocks from the courthouse square, for the purpose of offering any produce, goods or other merchandise for sale."

Our Aldermen Should Review the Impact of All Ordinances
Since huge numbers of Searcy residents would be fined for violating Section 14 and since nearly all the Get Down Downtown vendors would be fined based on Section 24, it is likely they should be removed from the Code of Ordinances or modified to make more sense.

As we vote for our aldermen for 2011-2012, we should research whether the candidates will revise outdated portions of the city ordinances, will refrain from stacking new ordinances on old ones causing over-regulation, and will lighten the regulatory burdens on individuals and businesses. We need better ordinances, not necessarily more of them.

Alderman Steve Sterling's Voting Record

Below is Alderman Steve Sterling's voting record on key issues from January 2009 to September 2010. The Searcy City Council meeting minutes are available on the city’s Web site, Searcy.com and clicking on “City Departments” “Clerk/Treasurer” “Agendas/Minutes.”

• Voted against placing on the agenda "the issue of an A&P tax on the ballot for the citizens of Searcy to decide" (February 10, 2009)
• Voted against a motion to draft an ordinance to refer the A&P tax to the people (March 10, 2009)
• Voted against a motion to "set a special election to submit the Advertising and Tourism Promotions Tax for a vote by the people of Searcy" (April 14, 2009 and May 12, 2009)
• Voted for Ordinance 2009-10 levying the A&P tax on the people of Searcy without letting them vote on it (May 12, 2009)
• Voted for Ordinance 2009-18 allowing non-residents of Searcy to serve on the Searcy Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (June 9, 2009)
• Voted for the appointment of seven A&P commissioners three of whom were not qualified electors, which violated the Arkansas Constitution, despite being presented with an Attorney General's opinion indicating such action was unconstitutional (June 9, 2009)
• Voted against a motion "to allow the citizens of Searcy to vote on the A&P tax, and to suspend collection of the tax until after such vote" even though referendum petitions had been filed and City Clerk Peggy Meads had "certified the sufficiency of signatures on the petitions" (July 14, 2009)
• Voted for Ordinance 2009-24 setting many new restrictions on the number and duration of yard sales within city limits (July 14, 2009)
• Voted to postpone indefinitely the appropriation of funds to hold an election on the A&P tax despite a September 30, 2009 ruling that the referendum petitions had been filed in a timely manner - Alderman Dale English later testified this was the ruling by Judge Tom Hughes (October 13, 2009)
• Voted against waiting on a proposal to make city elections nonpartisan to allow time to seek input from citizens and political parties (October 13, 2009)
• Voted against waiting on a proposal to make city elections nonpartisan until after a public hearing had been held on the subject (November 10, 2009)
• Voted for Resolution 2009-15 making city elections nonpartisan; nonpartisan elections have several negative effects on elections (November 10, 2009)
• Voted against a motion "to immediately suspend collection of the A&P tax pending the outcome of the special election;" approximately 99 percent of the amounts illegally collected will not be returned to taxpayers due to strict guidelines for the submission of refunds (December 8, 2009) 
• Voted to hold a special election on the A&P tax in April instead of waiting one month to hold the election in May, which cost the city thousands of dollars (December 8, 2009 and December 21, 2009)
• Voted against a motion to allow 90 days for the filing of referendum petitions (January 12, 2010)
• Voted for Ordinance 2010-03 restricting the deadline for referendum petitions to 30 days, limiting the time allowed for citizens to gather enough signatures to refer any city legislation for a vote of the people; referendum petitions are a check against city governments that act against the will of the people (February 23, 2010)
• Voted for Ordinance 2010-07 "for procedural rules of governance for meetings of the Searcy City Council," which codified Mayor Belinda LaForce's tight control of City Council meetings, largely replaced Robert's Rules of Order, the standard for Arkansas Municipal League meetings, as the guidelines for City Council meetings, and greatly restricted citizens from participating in City Council meetings (March 9, 2010)
• Voted against a motion to amend the A&P tax refund ordinance with the recommendations from the A&P tax refund committee, which attempted to address all problems that may occur and to make it as easy as possible for those who paid the tax to have it returned (June 22, 2010)
• Voted against "a motion to suspend consideration" of the new large scale development inspection fees "for thirty days to allow time to study the fee structure" (July 13, 2010)
• Voted for Ordinance 2010-22 creating a Searcy Tree Board (August 10, 2010)
• Voted for Ordinance 2010-24 establishing new "permit fees related to large-scale developments" (September 14, 2010)

Alderman Jim Dixon's Voting Record

Below is Alderman Jim Dixon's voting record on key issues from January 2009 to September 2010. The Searcy City Council meeting minutes are available on the city’s Web site, Searcy.com and clicking on “City Departments” “Clerk/Treasurer” “Agendas/Minutes.”

• Voted against placing on the agenda "the issue of an A&P tax on the ballot for the citizens of Searcy to decide" (February 10, 2009)
• Voted against a motion to draft an ordinance to refer the A&P tax to the people (March 10, 2009)
• Voted against a motion to "set a special election to submit the Advertising and Tourism Promotions Tax for a vote by the people of Searcy" (April 14, 2009 and May 12, 2009)
• Voted for Ordinance 2009-10 levying the A&P tax on the people of Searcy without letting them vote on it (May 12, 2009)
• Voted for Ordinance 2009-18 allowing non-residents of Searcy to serve on the Searcy Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (June 9, 2009)
• Voted for the appointment of seven A&P commissioners three of whom were not qualified electors, which violated the Arkansas Constitution, despite being presented with an Attorney General's opinion indicating such action was unconstitutional (June 9, 2009)
• Voted against a motion "to allow the citizens of Searcy to vote on the A&P tax, and to suspend collection of the tax until after such vote" even though referendum petitions had been filed and City Clerk Peggy Meads had "certified the sufficiency of signatures on the petitions" (July 14, 2009)
• Voted for Ordinance 2009-24 setting many new restrictions on the number and duration of yard sales within city limits (July 14, 2009)
• Voted to postpone indefinitely the appropriation of funds to hold an election on the A&P tax despite a September 30, 2009 ruling that the referendum petitions had been filed in a timely manner - Alderman Dale English later testified this was the ruling by Judge Tom Hughes (October 13, 2009)
• Voted against waiting on a proposal to make city elections nonpartisan to allow time to seek input from citizens and political parties (October 13, 2009)
• Voted against waiting on a proposal to make city elections nonpartisan until after a public hearing had been held on the subject (November 10, 2009)
• Voted for Resolution 2009-15 making city elections nonpartisan; nonpartisan elections have several negative effects on elections (November 10, 2009)
• Voted against a motion "to immediately suspend collection of the A&P tax pending the outcome of the special election;" approximately 99 percent of the amounts illegally collected will not be returned to taxpayers due to strict guidelines for the submission of refunds (December 8, 2009)
• Voted against his own motion to hold a special election on the A&P tax in April 2010 (December 8, 2009)
• Voted to hold a special election on the A&P tax in April instead of waiting one month to hold the election in May, which cost the city thousands of dollars (December 21, 2009)
• Voted against a motion to allow 90 days for the filing of referendum petitions (January 12, 2010)
• Voted for Ordinance 2010-03 restricting the deadline for referendum petitions to 30 days, limiting the time allowed for citizens to gather enough signatures to refer any city legislation for a vote of the people; referendum petitions are a check against city governments that act against the will of the people (February 23, 2010)
• Voted for Ordinance 2010-07 "for procedural rules of governance for meetings of the Searcy City Council," which codified Mayor Belinda LaForce's tight control of City Council meetings, largely replaced Robert's Rules of Order, the standard for Arkansas Municipal League meetings, as the guidelines for City Council meetings, and greatly restricted citizens from participating in City Council meetings (March 9, 2010)
• Voted against the formation of "a committee to consider criteria for the tax refund in an effort to address all problems that may occur and to make it as easy as possible for those who paid the tax to have it returned" (May 11, 2010)
• Voted against a motion to amend the A&P tax refund ordinance with the recommendations from the A&P tax refund committee, which attempted to address all problems that may occur and to make it as easy as possible for those who paid the tax to have it returned (June 22, 2010)
• Voted against "a motion to suspend consideration" of the new large scale development inspection fees "for thirty days to allow time to study the fee structure" (July 13, 2010)
• Voted for Ordinance 2010-22 creating a Searcy Tree Board (August 10, 2010)
• Voted for Ordinance 2010-24 establishing new "permit fees related to large-scale developments" (September 14, 2010)

Early Voting Information

Early voting ends in one week. It began October 18 at the White County Courthouse, and it runs through November 1. The Courthouse will be open for early voting at the following times:

• Monday through Friday 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M.
• Saturday 10:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M.

Bald Knob and Beebe also have early voting locations. More information on early voting in White County is available at the County Clerk's Web site.

Links to other information to help inform voters is available in our list of Voting Information links in the left column of the page.

Why Did Aldermen Sterling and Dixon Vote for Nonpartisan Elections?

The 2010 Searcy general election for all city officials is a "nonpartisan" election.

What is a nonpartisan election?
The two differences between Searcy's 2008 partisan election and the 2010 nonpartisan election are:

• The candidates did not compete in party primaries
• The candidates will not have their party affiliation listed on the November ballot

However, the candidates still retain their party affiliation, and they are still likely to behave in the future the way they have in the past.

Partisan vs Nonpartisan Elections
The National League of Cities (NLC), the U.S.-wide equivalent of the Arkansas Municipal League, lists the key arguments against nonpartisan elections:

• "Absence of party labels confuses voters; a voter who must choose from among a group of candidates who he or she knows nothing about will have no meaningful basis in casting a ballot;
• In absence of party ballot, voters will turn to whatever cue is available, and often this cue turns out to be the ethnicity of a candidate's name;
• Non-partisanship tends to produce elected officials more representative of the upper socioeconomic strata than of the general populace and aggravate the class bias in voting turnout, namely because in true non-partisan systems there are no organizations of local party workers to bring lower-class citizens to the polls on election day; and
• Non-partisanship destroys resources important to coalition building and effective governance."

NLC says the main argument for nonpartisan elections is "political parties are irrelevant to providing services; experts and professionals should determine the service needs of the constituents."

New York City has periodically considered the merits of nonpartisan elections. As nonpartisan elections were debated again this past June, the Wall Street Journal Metropolis blog had a news story citing the work of David Schleicher, who has researched nonpartisan elections. His conclusions echo the arguments against nonpartisan elections listed by NLC. They make it harder for voters to learn the facts about candidates, they lead to the election of social or economic elites, and they reduce voter turnout.

Why Did Aldermen Sterling and Dixon Vote for Nonpartisan Elections?
In the November 2009 City Council meeting, the Searcy City Council passed Resolution 2009-15. According to the meeting minutes, the aldermen voting for it were "Arnett, Dixon, Sterling, English and Chalenburg." Those voting against were "Nutter, Liles and Brewer." This resolution made all city elections nonpartisan.

Why would Alderman Steve Sterling, Alderman Jim Dixon, and three other aldermen (Arnett, English, and Chalenburg) vote for nonpartisan elections? By voting for nonpartisan elections, Alderman Sterling, Alderman Dixon, Alderman Arnett, and Alderman Chalenburg, who all ran as Republicans in 2008, avoided their party primaries. Instead, they are each facing off against their Republican challengers in the general election.

Regardless of their reasons, which were not mentioned in the November 2009 Council meeting minutes, nonpartisan elections are known to cause voter confusion, to reduce the motivation to vote, to obscure where a candidate stands on issues important to voters, and to lead to the election of social or economic elites who believe they "should determine the service needs of the constituents" rather than asking for and incorporating our feedback in governing our city. Is this what Alderman Steve Sterling and Alderman Jim Dixon want for Searcy?

Are Our Aldermen Legislators or the Mayor's Cabinet?

Searcy, Arkansas, has a mayor-council form of city government. According to the National League of Cities (NLC), the mayor-council form of city government includes the following characteristics:

• "Separation of powers between directly elected mayor and city council
• Mayor has executive powers while council has legislative powers
• Mayor is directly elected to office, often full-time and paid"

The separation of powers should result in the Mayor overseeing the day-to-day operation of the city, and the City Council authorizes spending, appoints commission and board members, and passes ordinances and resolutions that serve as the laws of the city. Since Mayor Belinda LaForce maintains tight control over the City Council meeting agenda, the subjects that can be brought before the City Council are limited.

Based on the Searcy City Council meeting minutes from January 2009 to September 2010, this current group of aldermen (Nutter, Arnett, Dixon, Sterling, English, Liles, Brewer, and Chalenburg) have voted approximately 400 times in those 21 months. Roughly 85 percent of those votes were procedural, authorized spending, or were appointments of commission and board members. Almost all of those 340 votes were unanimous. In the remaining 60 or so votes, one or more aldermen voted against a motion, an ordinance, a resolution, or a procedural step in enacting an ordinance or resolution.

Five aldermen (Arnett, Dixon, Sterling, English, and Chalenburg) voted for every item Mayor LaForce placed on Council meeting agendas during those 21 months. The other three aldermen voted against the following agenda items:

• The A&P Tax ordinance without referring it to the people for an election
• An ordinance permitting people who live outside Searcy to serve on Searcy's Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
• The unconstitutional appointment of the initial seven A&P Commissioners
• A resolution making Searcy city elections nonpartisan
• An ordinance limiting the deadline for the people to submit referendum petitions to 30 days
• The Searcy Tree Board ordinance that allows the city to remove citizens' trees, plants, and shrubs that overhang city rights of way
• An ordinance establishing new inspection fees for large scale developments

The other "No" votes in the past 21 months were cast by one or more aldermen for motions and other non-agenda items brought up during City Council meetings.

Most of the agenda items listed above that were rejected by 3/8 of the City Council were unpopular with the people of Searcy.

• A majority of voters rejected the A&P tax.
• As discussed in a March 4, 2010, article in the Daily Citizen, The Mayor LaForce herself noted that the "residency issue" for "A&P commissioners Oliver Montano, Bob White and Amanda Foust" "needed to be resolved."
• A major topic of discussion on News Talk 99.1 this past week has been nonpartisan elections with many callers not understanding the change and some strongly disagreeing with it. It is their current "Talk Back" subject.
• The ordinance limiting the deadline to file referendum petitions is a repeat of the attempt to suppress the people's right to vote (albeit, this time a legal one)
• More fees for large scale development could discourage such activity, and those costs are often passed on to the the people who will be living or shopping in those newly developed areas.

Are Our Aldermen Legislators or the Mayor's Cabinet?
Alderman Jim Dixon and Alderman Steve Sterling have voted with the group of alderman that rubber-stamp Mayor LaForce's agenda whether the people want it or not (and in some cases, whether it is legal or not). As our city legislators and representatives, our aldermen should listen to what the people say, not what the Mayor tells them to do.

Denying the People the Right to Vote

On June 29, 2009, referendum petitions were submitted to the Searcy City Clerk Peggy Meads. Voters all over Searcy signed the petitions, so they could vote for or against the A&P tax. These petitions contained over 1200 signatures, several hundred more than the required minimum number to refer the A&P tax ordinance to a vote of the people. In her capacity as City Clerk, Peggy Meads "certified the sufficiency of signatures on the petitions." Mayor Belinda LaForce and the Searcy City Council chose to ignore those petitions, and denied our referendum petition rights established in Amendment 7 of the Arkansas Constitution.

A 1948 ordinance setting the deadline for the filing of referendum petitions was the Mayor's and City Council's basis for denying us the right to vote. In a Daily Citizen article on June 16, 2009, Warren Watkins reported, "City Attorney Buck Gibson said the 1948 ordinance does apply to the A&P ordinance." However, later that day, Mayor Belinda LaForce researched the 1948 ordinance, and in her email to the City Attorney at 5:59 P.M., she reported the following conclusion:

"City adopted a new Code of Ordinances by Ordinance 519 (in attachment above)  I believe this Ordinance repealed all other ordinances except those specifically listed in the ordinance. There is nothing in that Code of Ordinances reflecting the City having a deadline on filing a referendum petition." (emphasis added)

So, according to Mayor Belinda LaForce the 1948 Ordinance 303 was repealed by Ordinance 519, and, therefore, it did NOT apply to the A&P ordinance. Still, she and the City Council chose to disregard the petitions anyway.

As a result of the City's disenfranchisement of the voters, a lawsuit was filed to compel the City government to hold an election on the A&P tax ordinance as required by the Arkansas Constitution. In a hearing on September 30, 2009, for that lawsuit, Judge Tom Hughes ruled the 1948 Ordinance 303 WAS REPEALED by Ordinance 519, and a March 27, 2010, Daily Citizen article reminded readers that this meant "the petitions were filed in a timely manner" (emphasis added).

After Judge Hughes' ruling, Alderman Carl Nutter motioned in the October 2009 City Council meeting for the City to appropriate funds for a special election on the A&P tax ordinance. Alderman Steve Sterling objected to Alderman Nutter's efforts and motioned that the subject be tabled indefinitely. Alderman Dale English seconded the motion, and it passed with the votes of Alderman Sterling, Alderman English, Alderman Mary Ann Arnett, Alderman Mike Chalenburg, and Alderman Jim Dixon. Aldermen Jackie Liles, Dale Brewer, and Carl Nutter voted against Alderman Sterling's motion.

In November 2009, Aldermen Steve Sterling and Jim Dixon were deposed in preparation for a hearing for the lawsuit to compel the City to hold the constitutionally-required election. In both Alderman Sterling's deposition and Alderman Dixon's deposition, Greg Niblock reminded them of Judge Hughes' ruling that the petitions were filed in a timely manner, and in the December 2009 City Council meeting, Alderman Dixon made a motion that the City hold an election on the A&P tax ordinance in April 2010. Ironically, he voted against his own motion.

Searcy voters should not require intervention from judges and lawyers for our City officials to allow us our constitutional right to vote.